I’m hanging out with Beth Daniels in her Corsets, Goggles, and Airships. Oh, my! Workshop over at Savvy Authors , and
realizing that I need to make some distinctions for myself about
steampunk. Now, mind you, these are for
my own convenience. Since I’m the resident steampunk aficionado here (or at
least the one charged with reporting), I
do need to know these things.
What do I need to know? That there is a kind of borderline
between Steam and Punk, and while I like both, I tend towards the punk side of
things.
OK, so what’s the difference?
I consider the Steam aspect of steampunk to be more
mainstream. Steam is brass and glass, airships and submarines, goggles and
giggles and corsets, oh my! Punk is
politics, subversion, exploitation and what is still wrong in the world. Steam is fantasy; punk is fury.
This kind of division is far from new. Science fiction is full of far-flung escapist
adventures as well as serious examinations of How Things Really Are Because
They Are Still Like That in the Future.
Even the godfathers of steampunk. H.G.Wells and Jules Verne, seemed to
see their worlds along similar lines.
Wells saw the horrors and Verne the technical fantasy. None of these is the right or wrong lens to
view steampunk through. Just different.
In terms of critique
or review, it’s important to know which end of the lens we are looking through.
Are we looking through the narrow end where the world of steam is shown so
close-up that we don’t have to see the world we live in? Or are we looking through the wide end where
the world of steam is seen in context with our own situation as only one aspect
of our technological and social experience.
Which direction we are writing in depends on which tropes we
are using. At least that’s how I’m organizing it for now, as I sort things out
for myself. When the story stays within
the social rules of Victorian middle and upper classes, I think of that as
leaning toward the Steam side. Parasol Protectorate, The Affinity Gate, and The Hunchback Assignments come to
mind. When the story focuses on the
technology as wielded by those classes, I also think of that as leaning toward
the steam side. Boneshaker, Leviathan,
and The Difference Engine fill that
bill.
On the other side are the stories of the CatastraphoneOrchestra, whose sole intent is to subvert the Victorian morality Seasonals to
give voice to the underside of Victorian New York. The Anachronist’sCookbook and ZeppelinCity also shift the POV from the privileged to the workers and hidden
classes by favoring the views of labor, the homeless, and children.
If there is a short way to define what I’m sorting for it’s in
that last statement: Which point of view
is favored? Sherlock Holmes’ or the
Baker Street Irregulars’? It doesn’t
matter what the good guys’ intentions are.
It’s all about effect and effectiveness.
Does it work? And for whom?
Slowly, slowly, slowly, I expect to refine my ideas about
the borderlines of steampunk. For now,
I’m pleased to have a place to start.
Thanks, Beth!
m
3 comments:
Love this post. Very cool. I haven't gotten much into Steampunk, but I like the concepts. This really helps with my understanding.
I like the handy phrase "Steam is fantasy; punk is fury." It helps me consider the themes separately. Great post, Melanie!
Hi Melanie,
I'm just putting a toe in the water of Steampunk and it sounds interesting! Any "bibles" of Steampunk that I should check out to learn more?
R.J.
Post a Comment